RE: [PEAR] testing that PEAR is installed (win2k/IIS5)

From: Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 15:18:25 +0000
Subject: RE: [PEAR] testing that PEAR is installed (win2k/IIS5)
References: 1  Groups: php.pear.general 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-general+get-12228@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Then please have a look at phpinfo() :-)) Maybe your include_path does not include the PEAR-directory. Do a "pear config-show" to find out where the dir is located, have a look for it in the phpinfo- output, and if it's not there, add it to your php.ini. Hope it helps, Stefan On 29 Apr 2004 at 16:05, George Pitcher wrote: > Thanks. 'pear list' gave me a list including the DB one that I need. > > I'll have a look for the cause of my problem tomorrow. > > Regards > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Stefan Neufeind [mailto:stefan@neufeind.net] > > Sent: 29 April 2004 3:49 pm > > To: pear-general@lists.php.net; George Pitcher > > Subject: Re: [PEAR] testing that PEAR is installed (win2k/IIS5) > > > > > > On 29 Apr 2004 at 15:12, George Pitcher wrote: > > > > > I'm just trying to get started with PEAR, mainly for DB abstraction, but > > > maybe more later. > > > > > > After following the installation notes, I'm testing using the > > patUser module > > > but 'the world just turns' endlessly. > > > > > > I'm not sure if PEAR or the db settings are at fault. Is there > > some form of > > > simple test (a la phpinfo()) for PEAR, or should it show somewhere in > > > phpinfo()? > > > > PEAR does not show up in phpinfo or similar since it is not a module > > for PHP. Do you have command-line access to that machine? If yes, > > simply try executing a "pear list" which will work if pear is > > installed and will give you a list of installed packages. If that > > works then your PEAR should be running fine.

« previous php.pear.general (#12228) next »