Re: HTML_Template_IT
| From: | Pierre-Alain Joye | Date: | Tue, 15 Jun 2004 14:13:35 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: HTML_Template_IT | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-general+get-13164@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 16:00:31 +0200
bmansion@mamasam.com (Bertrand Mansion) wrote:
> Yes, but that's my opinion only. I guess Pierre-Alain will have a
> different opinion as he maintains HTML_Template_IT/ITX. :)
Yup :)
> If you use HTML_Template_Sigma and your site has lots of visits,
> make sure you have a look at the preprocess feature. This is
> described in the documentation.
Well, that's the main difference. We have a different vision about
where should be the cache :). High traffic site obviously requires
cache (not only them btw ;) ), but caching the parsed template is
not sufficient, mixing cache everywhere is not a good idea and not
consistent.
That was my idea. Static contents being the best way, when it's
possible (and use IT to generate it once :D).
Regards,
--Pierre