Re: Where docs/description?

> Wow.. i imagine why it wasn't build earlier :). Really usefull thing! thanks ;) > Feedback. > In general it's very good, usefull and colorfull. good to hear that. > I have only a few > remarks: for installing package you're using plus mark, that's not > very obvious [at first time], mmh. plus = add = install ;) Does anyone have a better icon? > at least some text under it will be very > usefull. A text would destroy the layout. > And secondly you're using post method for installing I do? I don't think so! The Install-Buttons use <a>, so they should be GET. In IE6 walking back is no problem at all. (Do You use JS/DHTML or the simple version? Is the page reloaded after installing?) > But returning to the main question, i think you all PEAR contibutors > need to work more on the documentation. At least include examples on > using your modules in the manual. Because right now majority [almost > all] modules force to go in the source code and look how it works [at > all docs became useless]. Speaking about PEAR_Frontend_Web: It's in development at the moment. Installing may change soon, so writing docs could be a lost of time. But you are right. I will soon create at least a small docu. Christian Dickmann