Re: Little question about switch CS

From: Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 17:19:54 +0000
Subject: Re: Little question about switch CS
References: 1  Groups: php.pear.qa 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-2318@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 12:18, Helgi Þormar wrote: > Hi guys, > > http://pear.php.net/manual/en/standards.control.php anyone, am > I the > only one that things placing a extra new line after breaks is just quite > unnecessary ? > > I think most of the devs only use 1x new line, it's the most cleanest > IMHO, at least I think we should allow people to choose between 1 or 2x, > because if the switch sentence is a small one then it's okey to have 1x > new line, but if people are stuffing a lot of stuff in each case then it > makes sense to use 2x new lines. > > So is anyone against changing this ? What I'm proposing will keep BC > (even tho those things are less of a issue in regards to CS ;)). > > - Helgi Also brought to my attention (I just didn't notice this my self ;D *feels silly*) is that the manual doesn't indent, I feel that it should be like this: //short switches switch (condition) { case 1: action1; break; case 2: action2; break; default: defaultaction; break; } // long switches switch (condition) { case 1: action1; break; case 2: action2; break; default: defaultaction; break; } I usually align the breaks with content but this makes much more sense. Anyway what do you guys think about those changes ? - Helgi

« previous php.pear.qa (#2318) next »