Re: Little question about switch CS

Daniel Convissor wrote:

On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 05:19:54PM +0000, Helgi ?ormar wrote: The switch statement section is definitely the most common "let's revise the standard" thread. There was one back in early '04, if I remember correctly. Yeah - I brought it up, I think after someone asked me about it.. - more in relation to the fact that I've been the indentation illustrated below, and not what was in the manual. I think the conclusion was something along the lines, of not to change it, but to ignore the fact that people where adding the extra indentation. (From what I remember it was regarded as a little petty to enforce such a major change either way. )

I cant remember if this was in the context of having a few 'recommended, but not essential elements to the CS section'. Regards Alan

I prefer the following for both short and long: switch (condition) {

    case 1:
        action1;
        break;

    case 2:
        action2;
        break;

    default:
        defaultaction;

} Similar to the existing standard, but with the cases indented, just like every other bracketed thing in the standard. Thanks, --Dan