Re: Survey
| From: | Tobias Schlitt | Date: | Thu, 27 Nov 2003 17:31:15 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Survey | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.pear.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-245@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 14:27, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> Question 3: add [ ] plan to
> > I thought asking for categories would be more interessting here. All
> > categories are now available as checkboxes.
> Categories look fine to me, too. But can you but the checkboxes inside
> a table. The long list is kinda distracting, IMHO.
Sorry, the system does not support that. :(
> >> Question 8:
> >> "Quality about PEAR advertising/marketing/evangelism"
> >
> > Added.
> nope. you added it to 7, I'd rather like to see it in 8 :)
Now I did! ;) Will publish that, when I added all comments. (30 mins)
> > Added PHP|Arch. Please email me names of every PHP publication world
> > wide
> > you all know about!
>
> www.directionphp.biz
> www.phpsolmag.org
Added.
> >> And a question about external PEAR (doc) resources might be of
> >> interest.
> >
> > Didn't catch the point. What do you mean?
> hmm, what did I mean here? Probably, "Do you use non-pear.php.net
> PEAR resources, which ones and why and how's the quality and are
> they linked from pear.php.net".
Give me some idea of the question type?!
Do you use non pear.php.net resources? (yes/no)
If so, which non pear.php.net resources do you use? (input fields? how
many? textarea? checkboxes?)
How do you rate (in general? specific ones? give 3 textboxes above and
let rate the urls?) the quality of these resources?
> > Very good! Wanna have more people telling their thoughts!
> good luck :D
Thx!
a passion for php http://www.schlitt.info