Re: Net_Dict unmaintained

There is something to do with Net_Dict, you could bring the code for it up to Standard: http://pear.php.net/bugs/search.php?cmd=display&package_name[]=Net_Dict&status=OpenFeedback&bug_type=Bugs k. On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 5:44 AM, Joey Smith <joey@joeysmith.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 09:17:05AM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote: >> > >> > I have no bugs nor feature requests for the package - I have enough karma that if >> > something were broken, I'd just fix it :). I just thought I'd offer to fill >> > the >> > perceived need for a 'warm body' to watch over the package and its bug list. >> > I >> > suppose I just misunderstood the purpose of labelling packages as >> > 'unmaintained'. >> > Sorry for the noise. >> > >> >> You know... there's plenty of other fish in the sea. >> >> http://pear.php.net/qa/packages_orphan.php >> http://pear.php.net/qa/patches_on_open_reports.php >> >> http://pear.php.net/qa/packages_closed_reports_no_release.php >> >> Take a bit of a look through there, and if there are packages you use >> / are familiar with, and bugs that are patch worthy... :) > > I wasn't actually looking for something to do - someone mentioned it was marked > as unmaintained, the web page made it sound like the PEAR group wanted someone to > step up and take on responsibility for the package, so I offered to do so. I think > the text that goes on the 'orphaned package' pages is incredibly misleading in > that aspect. > > -- > PEAR QA Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- http://blogs.linux.ie/kenguest/