Re: Taking over Net_DNS
| From: | Ian Pye | Date: | Tue, 13 Apr 2010 05:26:58 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Taking over Net_DNS | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.pear.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-5652@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Thanks for the encouragement. I re-submitted a patch, which removes
some of the most egregious faults. I don't see any other Unit tests in
the NET_dns package -- am I not looking in the right place?
Ian
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Daniel O'Connor
<daniel.oconnor@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Matthew Fonda <matthewfonda@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Ian Pye <ianpye@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hey,
>> >
>> > Here you go:
>> > https://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=11665
>>
>>
>> Hi Ian,
>>
>> Please ensure your patch adheres to the PEAR coding standards.
>> See http://pear.php.net/manual/en/standards.php
>>
>
> Just to expand on that - we're about to pick on you a lot re coding
> standards and some of the approach you've taken when implementing your
> class.
> We're not being nasty; we're just looking for a few common traits that lead
> to maintainable code.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEhu57pih5w is a great watch to
> understand
> why we're on about no-work-in-constructor, unit testings, why we think
> global state is bad, etc.
>
> Please do give it another shot, we're keen to have patches :)
> -Daniel
>