Re: Taking over Net_DNS

From: Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:52:18 +0000
Subject: Re: Taking over Net_DNS
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8  Groups: php.pear.qa 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-5658@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Daniel O'Connor <daniel.oconnor@gmail.com> wrote: > Oops! Try: > > clockwerx@clockwerx-desktop:~/pear/Net_DNS/trunk$ php tests/AllTests.php Ahh! SVN. The tests directory is not in the release tarballs. > > > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Daniel O'Connor <daniel.oconnor@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Oneeee more round of picking on! >> Re: unit tests - well; it's never too early to start some coverage. >> I might put on my QA hat and make some test skeletons. >> >> At the moment, I'll apply the patch in its current form + some minor fixes >> to make it a bit more testable. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Ian Pye <ianpye@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks for the encouragement. I re-submitted a patch, which removes >>> some of the most egregious faults. I don't see any other Unit tests in >>> the NET_dns package -- am I not looking in the right place? >>> >>> Ian >>> >>> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Daniel O'Connor >>> <daniel.oconnor@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Matthew Fonda <matthewfonda@gmail.com> >>> > wrote: >>> >> >>> >> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Ian Pye <ianpye@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> > Hey, >>> >> > >>> >> > Here you go: >>> >> > https://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=11665 >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Hi Ian, >>> >> >>> >> Please ensure your patch adheres to the PEAR coding standards. >>> >> See >>> >> http://pear.php.net/manual/en/standards.php >>> >> >>> > >>> > Just to expand on that - we're about to pick on you a lot re coding >>> > standards and some of the approach you've taken when implementing your >>> > class. >>> > We're not being nasty; we're just looking for a few common traits that >>> > lead >>> > to maintainable code. >>> > >>> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEhu57pih5w is a >>> > great watch to >>> > understand >>> > why we're on about no-work-in-constructor, unit testings, why we think >>> > global state is bad, etc. >>> > >>> > Please do give it another shot, we're keen to have patches :) >>> > -Daniel >>> > >> > >

« previous php.pear.qa (#5658) next »