Re: Taking over Net_DNS
| From: | Ian Pye | Date: | Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:52:18 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Taking over Net_DNS | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Groups: | php.pear.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-5658@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Daniel O'Connor
<daniel.oconnor@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oops! Try:
>
> clockwerx@clockwerx-desktop:~/pear/Net_DNS/trunk$ php tests/AllTests.php
Ahh! SVN. The tests directory is not in the release tarballs.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Daniel O'Connor <daniel.oconnor@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Oneeee more round of picking on!
>> Re: unit tests - well; it's never too early to start some coverage.
>> I might put on my QA hat and make some test skeletons.
>>
>> At the moment, I'll apply the patch in its current form + some minor fixes
>> to make it a bit more testable.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Ian Pye <ianpye@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for the encouragement. I re-submitted a patch, which removes
>>> some of the most egregious faults. I don't see any other Unit tests in
>>> the NET_dns package -- am I not looking in the right place?
>>>
>>> Ian
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Daniel O'Connor
>>> <daniel.oconnor@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Matthew Fonda <matthewfonda@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Ian Pye <ianpye@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> > Hey,
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Here you go:
>>> >> > https://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=11665
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi Ian,
>>> >>
>>> >> Please ensure your patch adheres to the PEAR coding standards.
>>> >> See
>>> >> http://pear.php.net/manual/en/standards.php
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > Just to expand on that - we're about to pick on you a lot re coding
>>> > standards and some of the approach you've taken when implementing your
>>> > class.
>>> > We're not being nasty; we're just looking for a few common traits that
>>> > lead
>>> > to maintainable code.
>>> >
>>> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEhu57pih5w is a
>>> > great watch to
>>> > understand
>>> > why we're on about no-work-in-constructor, unit testings, why we think
>>> > global state is bad, etc.
>>> >
>>> > Please do give it another shot, we're keen to have patches :)
>>> > -Daniel
>>> >
>>
>
>