Re: Re: Prefixes for packages according to every category

On 16 Mar 2004 at 19:33, Michael Wallner wrote: > Hi Stefan Neufeind, you wrote: > > > As a first step I think we need to clarify about the prefixes (and > > maybe about the categories itself). Please comment! > > /me intruding once again :) You're welcome. > > 17. Benchmarking -> Bench?!? > Actually already has Benchmark, AFAIK. > > > 20. Console -> ?? > has Console... (Console_Getopt, Console_Table ...) > > > 23. Encryption -> ?? > already Crypt > > > 24. File Formats -> File?!? > > 25. File System -> File?!? > I see no problem here, too... Maybe we should put these two in one category? E.g. File_HtAccess is already under "file system" (why not Systems?) which sound a bit odd to me. And if they get the same prefix maybe they should also become the same category? > > 40. Text -> Text imho not an elegant category!! > Hm, why not? I didn't mean calling it "Text". I meant "Text" in general. > > 41. XML -> XML > > 42. Web Services -> ??? Okay, so this one is left - as it seems. Sobody got an idea for that? Or maybe it could be integrated in the Net-category? And keep in mind: If we make an official list of prefixes, where could they be shown in the docs? Stefan