Re: [pear-webmaster] bugdb.bug_type conflicts between pearweb and peclweb

On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 07:30, Daniel Convissor wrote: > Hi Folks: > > I just realized that when Helgi changed pearweb's bug interface to use > the new package_name column instead of the bug_type to store package > names, he didn't change peclweb's interface, which uses bug_type for > the package name. maybe that's because I don't have karma for peclweb, and I talked to pierre iirc at the time. > Then, he started reusing the bug_type column to distinguish "Bug" vs > "Feature/Change Requests." > > So, now we have a mess. actually you made a mess removing specific code yesterday, bug count is too high now. > The quick fix is search/replace all files in the peclweb to change > "bug_type" to "package_name." Once that's done, update the database, > because reports added/updated since Helgi's change have their package > names in the bug_type field. > > Another possiblity, or long term plan, for the peclweb folks is to > port the pearweb bug system over to peclweb. Helgi and I have > significantly cleaned up and enhanced PEAR's bug system and these > changes can benefit PECL developers and users. I've many times talked to pierre about this, and gotten, well, not so interesting responses ;) (that he's not interested that is.) -- Regards Helgi