Re: [pear-webmaster] bugdb.bug_type conflicts between pearweb and peclweb

On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 20:36, Martin Jansen wrote: > On Wed Aug 11, 2004 at 08:0454PM +0000, Helgi Þormar wrote: > > You could have said no when I talked about it, because this could brake > > the PECLWeb, > > I only remember that you once approached me on IRC about the planned > change. If that is what you consider announcing a change, than our ways > of collaboration probably differ a lot. But I did iirc talk about this on the list, if it was only one time on irc, then it's kinda silly of you to accepted to do this database change for me :) > > I'm helping with pear not pecl, and tell me, the difference > > between the pecl and pear bug system is ? > > I haven't much clue about the PECL website, but it should be obvious > that every change that involves database updates need to be merged in > the PECL website because pear.php.net and pecl.php.net run on top of the > same database. No matter if you are only "helping with PEAR" or not. ....... Well maybe the main question is, why is this coming up now, and it's been like few months since this happened ? I'm not quite getting that part, but anyway, does pecl want the whole updated bug system or just fixing regarding the package_name ? > > Also, I brought this issue with the peclweb bug system in the past to > > pierre, and said I'd fix up the peclweb (the little that needed to be > > fixed at the time + I had much more free time) but pierre said it > > wouldn't be needed or that the pecl people didn't want more fiddling > > from the pear people in their web or something, can't remember, but the > > main point is, I got turned down when I offered to fix this at the time. > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't remember any discussion about your > change on the webmasters lists. Why did you only talk to Pierre about > that? Because it was long time ago, and I wasn't started activly to email the ML...