Re: [pear-webmaster] Services_TrackBack?

On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 17:44:59 +0200 techtonik@php.net (Anatoly Techtonik) wrote: > Noooooo. Proposals for pearweb would kill any progress and > innovation. It was not a question, sorry. And if you read again, there is nothing saying that you cannot do something you need but only to use one you suppose it will be a pear package, in that case, Service_Trackback. Imagine, a given package is rejected, but we use for pearweb. Something that is not good for the pear repository is good enough for the pear infrastructure? I do not think so. > It is like recieving permissions before making > yourself a sandwich. Why everyone here is trying to remove art > from PEAR and make it system with death penalties even before > action occured like in some futuristic film with Tom Cruise? Read again the archives. Again and again, maybe one more time before to post an answer. > Is coding so dangerous to treat developers like children? Stability is. Everyone is asking for high quality or "enterprise" things, all these requirements are simply not possible if you keep the heart of the PEAR infrastructre as a sandbox game. Anatoly, please, next time keep in mind what I'm talking and the context. When I talk about PEAR here (pearweb list), it's all about the infrastructure, so yes, I rather tend to be conservative instead of widely innovative. Past proves I'm totally wrong to be like that. Regards, --Pierre