Re: something I noticed re:licenses.
| From: | Anil Madhavapeddy | Date: | Fri, 19 Jan 2001 22:22:53 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: something I noticed re:licenses. | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-pear+get-1104@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Quoting Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@linuxcare.com>:
>
> Actually what I said was that everything in PEAR should have the same
> license. I don't really care which license that is. I would prefer an
> Apache-style license like the PHP one.
I was wanting a bit of clarity on this actually, if there are any license
gurus out there ...
If PEAR were released under the GPL, any code that uses it would also have
to GPLed; is that right? If it is, then it pretty much rules out GPL as a
viable single-license for PEAR... otherwise, is there any way to avoid my
code coming under the GPL, if I wish to distribute it?
--
Anil Madhavapeddy, <anil@recoil.org>