Re: something I noticed re:licenses.

I see no reason to sign over the copyright. On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, Alex Black wrote: > > Actually what I said was that everything in PEAR should have the same > > license. I don't really care which license that is. I would prefer an > > Apache-style license like the PHP one. If each PEAR component had a > > different license it would be very difficult for someone to figure out > > what they could use and what they couldn't. We don't want that. > > > So yes, as far as I am concerned, a prerequisite of being part of PEAR is > > to put the contribution under whatever unified license is chosen for PEAR. > > hi rasmus, > > re: license, that's actually fine with me. the pear-ized php license looks > totally fine. > > my question was specifically regarding copyright and how you intend to > handle it with pear. > > it is: > > -every file that I have seen in pear so far is copyrighted by the PHP > Group, despite the fact that many of the authors are not members of the PHP > Group. > > So, do I have to sign over copyright to the PHP Group for everything I > contribute to PEAR? > > That question is extremely important to me. > > -alex > > > > -- > PHP Extension and Add-on Repository (PEAR) mailing list. > Documentation can be found at http://pear.php.net/doc/pear.html > To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-pear-unsubscribe@lists.php.net from the > mail address you subscribed with. >