Re: something I noticed re:licenses.

> A lot of things have been said here, and I think Rasmus once said that > everything should have the PHP license. This was not my intent > originally, I was thinking more of just requiring an open source license > (OSD). However, stuff that is distributed with PHP is another story, it > must have the PHP license. Standalone PEAR packages can in theory be > GPL'ed, but then there's the question of whether including PHP code is > considered runtime or not. If it is not considered runtime, it may be > in violation of the GPL to mix PHP licensed and GPL'ed code in a > script. Blargh. :-) > > - Stig hi stig, got it. re the gpl, as far as I am concerned, under the GPL, binarycloud complies - and anyone building proprietary modules within binarycloud can retain their oen licensing scheme. is stallman really going after people about this stuff? it would be a mistake on his part. :) _a