RE: [PHP-PEAR] RFC on merge of PHPLib and Pear
| From: | Jeffrey A. Stuart | Date: | Wed, 07 Mar 2001 16:42:11 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP-PEAR] RFC on merge of PHPLib and Pear | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-pear+get-1633@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Ok... fine... to steal a line from Ulf, then submit your own... :)
--
Jeff (FurBall)
WebOverdrive Newbie Tech Board
http://www.topniche.com/tech/
furball@weboverdrive.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Chuck Hagenbuch [mailto:chuck@horde.org]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 11:28 AM
To: php-pear@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-PEAR] RFC on merge of PHPLib and Pear
Quoting Björn Schotte <bjoern@baer.main.de>:
> Yes, Auth depends on Session. But (I'm not very familiar with
> CPAN, but I think it is) is it true that on CPAN you find
> a lot of modules which depend on other modules, isn't it?
Let me try again.
User authentication/permissions/etc. is a big, complicated area. Phplib's
solutions for that area aren't generic solutions that let you tackle any
project; they're specific solutions that let you tackle some smaller/simpler
kinds of projects.
Therefore, I don't think they should become the "PEAR Auth", "PEAR User",
etc.
official solutions. I can live with them being inside a PHPLib/ directory,
and
being PHPLib_Auth, etc. But if they're going to be in PEAR, even in a
PHPLib/
directory, they should follow PEAR conventions, so they're going to change,
and
their current API will break...
-chuck
--
Charles Hagenbuch, <chuck@horde.org>
"Live, from Washington, where the doctors were telling us what they did, and
did not, do with Vice President Cheney." -Dan Rather
--
PHP Extension and Add-on Repository (PEAR) mailing list.
Documentation can be found at http://pear.php.net/doc/pear.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-pear-unsubscribe@lists.php.net from the
mail address you subscribed with.