Re: RFC on merge of PHPLib and Pear

Chuck Hagenbuch wrote: > > Quoting Björn Schotte <bjoern@baer.main.de>: > > > Why that? PHPLIB consists of several classes which don't > > depend on each other, so why put those execellent things > > outside of PEAR? Why not putting i.e. Cache/ outside of PEAR > > because it could be part of an app framework? > > But the parts of PHPLIB that I'm saying should remain outside PEAR - auth, > user, and perm - _do_ depend on each other. That's the only thing I'm saying > should be outside. > > Cache:: is a building block you can use; auth/user/perm define a lot of how > you're building your app. I don't mind that these classes depend on each others, it's a solution people can use in many cases. I'll write a successor one fine day, promote it and wait for people's reaction. Chuck, I don't buy your position and you don't buy mine, we exchanged the arguments before. All others, please remember Chuck and me are guys like you on this list. Chuck does not talk law (and he never tried that) and I do not also. You'll be offered an auth/user/perm solution and it's up to you to decide wheter you want it in PEAR or not, this argue leads to nothing. Ulf