Re: Re: cvs: php4 /pear DB.php /pear/DBcommon.phperror.phpmysql.php result.php warning.php

From: Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2000 19:11:33 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: cvs: php4 /pear DB.php /pear/DBcommon.phperror.phpmysql.php result.php warning.php
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  Groups: php.pear 
Request: Send a blank email to php-pear+get-502@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Mon, 04 Dec 2000, Chuck Hagenbuch wrote: > I'm interested in other people's thoughts on this one - it certainly makes > sense to in general split classes out into new files. But some classes - like > PEAR:: and PEAR_Error:: - are core functionality as well as being closely > related, so it makes sense to keep them in the same file. > > I don't really know what the performance factors are; I imagine that modern > OS's disk caching should take care of most of it, but not at least thinking > about it and trying to reduce disk hits seems irresponsible to me. I see no problems with having multiple classes in the same file as long as they are closely related. -Andrei * The great thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from. *

« previous php.pear (#502) next »