Re: Re: cvs: php4 /pear DB.php /pear/DBcommon.phperror.phpmysql.php result.php warning.php

From: Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2000 07:14:03 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: cvs: php4 /pear DB.php /pear/DBcommon.phperror.phpmysql.php result.php warning.php
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8  Groups: php.pear 
Request: Send a blank email to php-pear+get-506@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
> On Mon, 04 Dec 2000, Chuck Hagenbuch wrote: > > I'm interested in other people's thoughts on this one - it certainly makes > > sense to in general split classes out into new files. But some classes - like > > PEAR:: and PEAR_Error:: - are core functionality as well as being closely > > related, so it makes sense to keep them in the same file. > > > > I don't really know what the performance factors are; I imagine that modern > > OS's disk caching should take care of most of it, but not at least thinking > > about it and trying to reduce disk hits seems irresponsible to me. > > I see no problems with having multiple classes in the same file as long > as they are closely related. > I also agree. For example a class's error class (PEAR_Error related) should be in the same file as the class itself. -Sterling

« previous php.pear (#506) next »