Re: pear installer

From: Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 21:22:33 +0000
Subject: Re: pear installer
References: 1  Groups: php.pear 
Request: Send a blank email to php-pear+get-947@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Martin Jansen wrote: > OK, I'm convinced (but I'm still wondering if we should > _really_ take care of _all_ old browsers...). > > But what extension should be taken now? .tgz? Well, i'm not even sure that the newer browsers don't do it, I just know that they old ones did :-) I think the preference should probably go towards .tgz seeing that it's almost as common as .tar.gz, however as long as we're using standard gz compressed tar archives, either should probably be acceptable. -peace --- BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK ----------+---------- GAT d- s:+ !a C++$ UL/S/I/B++++$ P+ | "In the ongoing battle between objects L++ E- W+(+++) N K- w(---) O-- M@ | made of aluminum going hundreds of V(--) PS+++ PE Y+ PGP@ t++ 5 X+ R- | miles per hour and the ground going tv+ b- DI++++ D+(+++) G e>++ h--- | zero, the ground has yet to lose." r++ z+>+++ - END GEEK CODE BLOCK ---+

« previous php.pear (#947) next »