Re: pear installer

On Wed, 10 Jan 2001 16:22:33 -0500 (EST), Kendrick Vargas wrote: >On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Martin Jansen wrote: > >> OK, I'm convinced (but I'm still wondering if we should >> _really_ take care of _all_ old browsers...). >> >> But what extension should be taken now? .tgz? > >Well, i'm not even sure that the newer browsers don't do it, I just know >that they old ones did :-) Internet Explorer 5, Netscape 4.7 and Netscape 6 work properly :-). >I think the preference should probably go towards .tgz seeing that it's >almost as common as .tar.gz, however as long as we're using standard gz >compressed tar archives, either should probably be acceptable. ACK. -Martin -- · Martin Jansen · mailto:mj@php.net · · Monschau, Germany · http://martin-jansen.de ·