Re: Is "event" extension still maintained? Or what about libevent 2?

On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Ruslan Osmanov <rrosmanov@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Is `event' PECL extension still maintained? I'm thinking of writing new > one, since both event' and libevent' don't > support libevent 2. > > I could contribute to libevent's code. But there is deprecated/changed API > in libevent 2. Also, "libevent" isn't good name for extension(I know, > "event" extension was already there...). > > Thus, if `event' extension is no longer maintained, I'd like to use this > name for a new extension. Or, maybe you would suggest another name. Ehm, > "AnyEvent", "YAEvent"("yet another event" :), "events", > "ooevent"("object-oriented event" [I'd like to make OO API])... :-/ > > So what's better: > > - a new extension with different name(e.g. "OOEvent") > > - fork libevent, make it compatible with libevent 2, add new functions, > request merge; > > - fork libevent, make it compatible with libevent 2, add new functions, > request merge? > > The main purpose is to add libevent 2 API support and some missing > functions(e.g. ssl and http stuff) > Hello, I don't think ext/event is maintained anymore, as the last release is back from 2004. ext/libevent should be maintained thought not very active. Wait for their main authors to reply this mail, perhaps you could merge your work with theirs ;-) Julien.Pauli