Re: Is "event" extension still maintained? Or what about libevent 2?

From: Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 18:16:07 +0000
Subject: Re: Is "event" extension still maintained? Or what about libevent 2?
References: 1 2  Groups: php.pecl.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-10148@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
I don't believe anyone is actively working on these any more, it would make sense for someone to take ownership. --Wez. On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:59 AM, Julien Pauli <jpauli@php.net> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Ruslan Osmanov <rrosmanov@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Is `event' PECL extension still maintained? I'm thinking of writing new >> one, since both event' and libevent' don't >> support libevent 2. >> >> I could contribute to libevent's code. But there is deprecated/changed >> API in libevent 2. Also, "libevent" isn't good name for extension(I know, >> "event" extension was already there...). >> >> Thus, if `event' extension is no longer maintained, I'd like to use this >> name for a new extension. Or, maybe you would suggest another name. Ehm, >> "AnyEvent", "YAEvent"("yet another event" :), >> "events", >> "ooevent"("object-oriented event" [I'd like to make OO API])... >> :-/ >> >> So what's better: >> >> - a new extension with different name(e.g. "OOEvent") >> >> - fork libevent, make it compatible with libevent 2, add new functions, >> request merge; >> >> - fork libevent, make it compatible with libevent 2, add new functions, >> request merge? >> >> The main purpose is to add libevent 2 API support and some missing >> functions(e.g. ssl and http stuff) >> > > Hello, > > I don't think ext/event is maintained anymore, as the last release is back > from 2004. > ext/libevent should be maintained thought not very active. > > Wait for their main authors to reply this mail, perhaps you could merge > your work with theirs ;-) > > Julien.Pauli >

« previous php.pecl.dev (#10148) next »