Re: Is "event" extension still maintained? Or what about libevent 2?

From: Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 18:35:09 +0000
Subject: Re: Is "event" extension still maintained? Or what about libevent 2?
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.pecl.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-10149@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Okay. Then I'm beginning to develop(slowly) new version of "event" extension. Wez, I'll drop a post to the mailing list(and you) when it's done. On 01/02/2013 11:16 PM, Wez Furlong wrote:
I don't believe anyone is actively working on these any more, it would make sense for someone to take ownership.
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:59 AM, Julien Pauli<jpauli@php.net> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Ruslan Osmanov<rrosmanov@gmail.com>wrote:
Hi, Is `event' PECL extension still maintained? I'm thinking of writing new one, since both event' and libevent' don't support libevent 2. I could contribute to libevent's code. But there is deprecated/changed API in libevent 2. Also, "libevent" isn't good name for extension(I know, "event" extension was already there...). Thus, if `event' extension is no longer maintained, I'd like to use this name for a new extension. Or, maybe you would suggest another name. Ehm, "AnyEvent", "YAEvent"("yet another event" :), "events", "ooevent"("object-oriented event" [I'd like to make OO API])... :-/ So what's better: - a new extension with different name(e.g. "OOEvent") - fork libevent, make it compatible with libevent 2, add new functions, request merge; - fork libevent, make it compatible with libevent 2, add new functions, request merge? The main purpose is to add libevent 2 API support and some missing functions(e.g. ssl and http stuff)
-- Regards, Ruslan Osmanov http://osmanov-dev-notes.blogspot.com | @ruslan_osmanov | +998916818499

« previous php.pecl.dev (#10149) next »