Re: Re: PECL Account Approval - Was: Rant: Is anybody in power reading this at all?
| From: | Anatoliy Belsky | Date: | Wed, 02 Jan 2013 19:35:29 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: PECL Account Approval - Was: Rant: Is anybody in power reading this at all? | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-10150@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi,
I'd suggest to link that wiki page directly under "PECL resources" on
http://pecl.php.net/support.php for better
reachability.
Regards
Anatoliy
On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 19:10 +0100, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Daniel Brown <danbrown@php.net> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > If anybody disagrees with any of these actions feel free to revert and
> > > explain the possible reasons.
> >
> > You can all feel free to take my opinion here with a grain of
> > salt, but what makes the most sense to me is to give Ferenc (tyrael)
> > authority to make decisions and approve or reject the accounts. He's
> > demonstrated that he can not only research and make intelligent,
> > educated decisions, but has also proven that he has the best interests
> > of PHP and the various subprojects at heart.
> >
> > He's around more frequently than a good majority of folks, too,
> > which should help to expedite the process. In a lot of cases, I could
> > see him being able to reach out to a PECL package maintainer and get a
> > nod or nay from them and determine the account eligibility within the
> > same day. And, at the least, he'd be an additional point of contact
> > and pair of eyes (though I'm stepping out on a limb here, since I have
> > no guarantee he does indeed have both of his eyes still in his head).
> >
> > Point being, he's a diligent researcher and excellent communicator
> > who could be very beneficial to the approval process, who could
> > facilitate project and developer transfers, and could help to "get 'em
> > while they're hot" --- that is, to bring new blood into the fold while
> > they've got the drive to get things done, rather than have their
> > request (and interest) stagnate.
> >
> > Not sure it would require a vote to give someone that kind of
> > authority, but if so, consider this my nomination.
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> I didn't wanted to reply to this mail, as it seemed awkward (Dan made me
> blush).
> I agree with Dan that we have a lot to improve on our process of reviewing
> pecl account request.
> I took the time and reviewed the remaining pecl account requests over the
> holidays and only 7 of them left pending (from the 60 or so).
> There were multiple cases where the package author already lost interest in
> the development/distribution of the package when I've contacted him/her
> about the request.
> We are talking about turn-around times of months and even years. :(
> Hopefully now that we have left packages and more people with the karma of
> managing account requests the response times will improve.
> I would also like to thank Johannes personally for his persistence on
> reviewing the code of the proposed packages and for putting together
> https://wiki.php.net/internals/review_comments
>