Re: Extension proposals

Hi, Le Mon, 04 Feb 2013 13:25:36 +0100, Michael Wallner a écrit : > First, I'd like to release two supplementary extensions, > which were split off of pecl_http-v2 to be able to reuse it in other > extensions: I suppose they will be mandatory to make pecl_http-v2 to work ? Will pecl install these dependancies automaticaly ? > Resource and persistent handle factory > https://bitbucket.org/mike_php_net/ext-raphf Unified API for > custom > persistent and non-persistent resources/connections. Can you provide a php code example of what it does ? There's no test files and I don't see exactly what it does. > Property proxy: > https://bitbucket.org/mike_php_net/ext-propro Access virtual > object > properties by reference and/or array key/index. Doesn't it go "against" the getter/setter rfc proposal ? (https:// wiki.php.net/rfc/propertygetsetsyntax-v1.2) Sure, not accepted yet but I hope one day ;-) > I'd also like to release a new libpq binding through PECL: > https://bitbucket.org/mike_php_net/ext-pq Isn't already there a libpq implementation in ext (http://www.php.net/ manual/en/ref.pgsql.php) and also a pdo_connector ? What are the benefits this new binding ? > Any objections, comments, flames? :) Never flames ;-) Anyway, reusability is always a good thing \o/ ++ Bruno