Re: Re: Extension proposals

On 5 February 2013 09:08, Bruno CHALOPIN <bruno@chalopin.fr> wrote: > Hi, > > Le Mon, 04 Feb 2013 13:25:36 +0100, Michael Wallner a écrit : >> First, I'd like to release two supplementary extensions, >> which were split off of pecl_http-v2 to be able to reuse it in other >> extensions: > > I suppose they will be mandatory to make pecl_http-v2 to work ? Will pecl > install these dependancies automaticaly ? Yep and yep. PEAR's package.xml has dependencies support. > >> Resource and persistent handle factory >> https://bitbucket.org/mike_php_net/ext-raphf Unified API >> for custom >> persistent and non-persistent resources/connections. > > Can you provide a php code example of what it does ? There's no test > files and I don't see exactly what it does. This is actually for internal usage only and exports just 2 functions to userland a cleanup routine, raphf\clean_persistent_handles(), and a stat routine raphf\stat_persistent_handles(). It's used to create the connection handles of pecl/http and pecl/pq. >> Property proxy: >> https://bitbucket.org/mike_php_net/ext-propro Access >> virtual object >> properties by reference and/or array key/index. > > Doesn't it go "against" the getter/setter rfc proposal ? (https:// > wiki.php.net/rfc/propertygetsetsyntax-v1.2) Sure, not accepted yet but I > hope one day ;-) Does it? I don't know... It's again primarily for internal usage like returning a reference to an virtual property of an internal class' object which is buried in some C struct or only accessible through a function call. You can see it in action here: http://svn.php.net/viewvc/pecl/http/branches/DEV_2/php_http_message.c?view=markup#l1085 and what it does: http://svn.php.net/viewvc/pecl/http/branches/DEV_2/tests/propertyproxy001.phpt?view=markup >> I'd also like to release a new libpq binding through PECL: >> https://bitbucket.org/mike_php_net/ext-pq > > Isn't already there a libpq implementation in ext (http://www.php.net/ > manual/en/ref.pgsql.php) and also a pdo_connector ? What are the benefits > this new binding ? Right and right ;) No obvious benefits, just serious fun. -- Regards, Mike