Re: Extension proposals

From: Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 09:46:52 +0000
Subject: Re: Extension proposals
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.pecl.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-10294@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On 6 February 2013 10:18, Gustavo Lopes <glopes@nebm.ist.utl.pt> wrote: > On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 13:25:36 +0100, Michael Wallner <mike@php.net> wrote: > >> Resource and persistent handle factory >> https://bitbucket.org/mike_php_net/ext-raphf >> Unified API for custom persistent and non-persistent >> resources/connections. >> >> Property proxy: >> https://bitbucket.org/mike_php_net/ext-propro >> Access virtual object properties by reference and/or array key/index. >> > > Do you think any of these would be useful integrated in the core? For > instance, if you found the zend_proxy_object stuff in Zend/ useless, maybe > we could replace it with what you came up with. Duh, no idea. The Property proxy implementation still lacks a few object handlers but looks promising so far; personally I find the zend_object_proxy pretty useless, but you might remember, you've been part of the discussion: http://marc.info/?t=128351193900002&r=1&w=2 The Resource and persistent handle factory has been implemented, because I had some serious problems or discovered shortcomings I would not want to live with; but for more exact reasons, I'd have to search the commit log, as I cannot remember them anymore. At last, the problem with integration into core to me is always: This would be available for at least PHP-5.4 maybe even 5.3 while in core it would be, say, 5.6 at the earliest. Anyway, I dont' think man core people are interested in this stuff. Cheers -- Regards, Mike

« previous php.pecl.dev (#10294) next »