Re: Request to Publish in PECL

Hey: On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Laruence <laruence@php.net> wrote: > Hey: > > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:27 PM, <liaohuqiu@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I am a developer currently with Alibaba inc. I want to host my extension in php.net. A >> few weeks ago, I emailed this mail list and was told that my codes needed some improvements because >> of my non-C89 code style and lacking test case. >> >> Since then I have made improvements accordingly and am requesting to publish the >> extension again. This extension is called BIN PACK. Here is the source code: >> https://github.com/binpack/binpack-php >> >> It’s a binary serialize format. Like JSON, It can be used to transfer data between >> languages. >> It’s quite simple. Like JSON, it supports the basic data types: bool / null / int / >> double / string / blob / list / map. >> It’s also fast. It may be the fastest serialize implementation in php. It is 25+ % >> faster than msgpack. >> >> This serialize data format, BIN PACK, is very suitable for RPC. In our company, there >> are lots of services written in Java and backend API and web page in PHP. BIN PACK is used to >> exchange data between JAVA and php. It’s simpler and faster than msgpack ; It is >> self-descritptive, which is quite different from other compression serialize formats such as >> ProtoBuffer. >> >> Listed below are some sites for your information: >> Here’s my Github: https://github.com/liaohuqiu. >> StackOverflow: >> http://stackoverflow.com/users/2446397/srain >> Blog: http://www.liaohuqiu.net/ >> >> Thank you for your time. > > sorry for delay, I was quite busy recently :< > > from what I can see, actually bin pack and msgpack are very similar. > > and the performance are also very similar (msgpack did more logics). > but msgpack pack supports more languages and have more usage already. > > so, to me, I prefer make bin pack and msgpack computable rather than > make a new "bin formart serialize protocol"... > > what do your think? I am not subjecting this to be list in PECL, that is my 2 cents Anyway, the codes seems clear, one suggest, if you don't need MINIT/RINIT , then remove them.. Tyrael, please have a look of this :) thanks > > thanks >> >> Regards, >> >> Huqiu >> >> liaohuqiu@gmail.com > > > > -- > Laruence Xinchen Hui > http://www.laruence.com/ -- Laruence Xinchen Hui http://www.laruence.com/