Re: Request to Publish in PECL

On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Huqiu Liao <liaohuqiu@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, Tyrael, Laruence: > > just wondering about the status of the request to publish. any more > suggestions to proceed? > > Also ,I'd like to know more about the idea of making BIN PACK and msgpack > compatible. I'd very much appreciate any detailed suggestions regarding this > issue before i can really try to make it happen. Hey: I don't think you need to do that to make it list in PECL.. it's just a feature maybe. for now, I think just need someone to approval your request.. :) thanks > > Huqiu Liao > > > On Jul 18, 2014, at 4:09 PM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2014.07.18. 6:23, "Laruence" <laruence@php.net> ezt írta: >> >> Hey: >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Laruence <laruence@php.net> wrote: >> > Hey: >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:27 PM, <liaohuqiu@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> I am a developer currently with Alibaba inc. I want to host my >> >> extension in php.net. A few weeks ago, I emailed this mail list and was >> >> told that my codes needed some improvements because of my non-C89 code style >> >> and lacking test case. >> >> >> >> Since then I have made improvements accordingly and am requesting >> >> to publish the extension again. This extension is called BIN PACK. Here is >> >> the source code: >> >> https://github.com/binpack/binpack-php >> >> >> >> It’s a binary serialize format. Like JSON, It can be used to >> >> transfer data between languages. >> >> It’s quite simple. Like JSON, it supports the basic data types: >> >> bool / null / int / double / string / blob / list / map. >> >> It’s also fast. It may be the fastest serialize implementation in >> >> php. It is 25+ % faster than msgpack. >> >> >> >> This serialize data format, BIN PACK, is very suitable for RPC. In >> >> our company, there are lots of services written in Java and backend API >> >> and web page in PHP. BIN PACK is used to exchange data between JAVA and php. >> >> It’s simpler and faster than msgpack ; It is self-descritptive, which is >> >> quite different from other compression serialize formats such as >> >> ProtoBuffer. >> >> >> >> Listed below are some sites for your information: >> >> Here’s my Github: >> >> https://github.com/liaohuqiu. >> >> StackOverflow: >> >> http://stackoverflow.com/users/2446397/srain >> >> Blog: http://www.liaohuqiu.net/ >> >> >> >> Thank you for your time. >> > >> > sorry for delay, I was quite busy recently :< >> > >> > from what I can see, actually bin pack and msgpack are very similar. >> > >> > and the performance are also very similar (msgpack did more logics). >> > but msgpack pack supports more languages and have more usage already. >> > >> > so, to me, I prefer make bin pack and msgpack computable rather than >> > make a new "bin formart serialize protocol"... >> > >> > what do your think? >> I am not subjecting this to be list in PECL, that is my 2 cents >> >> Anyway, the codes seems clear, >> >> one suggest, if you don't need MINIT/RINIT , then remove them.. >> >> Tyrael, please have a look of this :) > > Could you explain what do you mean compatible? > do you mean binpack should you the same format as msgpack but only > supporting the subset of the types? > if thats possible and wouldn't require too much work I think it would be > nice, but not mandatory for being allowed to pecl. -- Laruence Xinchen Hui http://www.laruence.com/