Re: Request to Publish in PECL

Hi all, How is this going on? Who can have a look at this? thanks. On Jul 21, 2014, at 3:11 PM, Laruence <laruence@php.net> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Huqiu Liao <liaohuqiu@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, Tyrael, Laruence: >> >> just wondering about the status of the request to publish. any more >> suggestions to proceed? >> >> Also ,I'd like to know more about the idea of making BIN PACK and msgpack >> compatible. I'd very much appreciate any detailed suggestions regarding this >> issue before i can really try to make it happen. > Hey: > > I don't think you need to do that to make it list in PECL.. it's > just a feature maybe. > > for now, I think just need someone to approval your request.. :) > > thanks >> >> Huqiu Liao >> >> >> On Jul 18, 2014, at 4:09 PM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> 2014.07.18. 6:23, "Laruence" <laruence@php.net> ezt írta: >>> >>> Hey: >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Laruence <laruence@php.net> wrote: >>>> Hey: >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:27 PM, <liaohuqiu@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> I am a developer currently with Alibaba inc. I want to host my >>>>> extension in php.net. A few weeks ago, I emailed this mail list and was >>>>> told that my codes needed some improvements because of my non-C89 code style >>>>> and lacking test case. >>>>> >>>>> Since then I have made improvements accordingly and am requesting >>>>> to publish the extension again. This extension is called BIN PACK. Here is >>>>> the source code:  >>>>> µÖÖqªÚŒ\þäâ+<–https://github.com/binpack/binpack-php >>>>> >>>>> It’s a binary serialize format. Like JSON, It can be used to >>>>> transfer data between languages. >>>>> It’s quite simple. Like JSON, it supports the basic data types: >>>>> bool / null / int / double / string / blob / list / map. >>>>> It’s also fast. It may be the fastest serialize implementation in >>>>> php. It is 25+ % faster than msgpack. >>>>> >>>>> This serialize data format, BIN PACK, is very suitable for RPC. In >>>>> our company, there are lots of services written in Java and backend API >>>>> and web page in PHP. BIN PACK is used to exchange data between JAVA and php. >>>>> It’s simpler and faster than msgpack ; It is self-descritptive, which is >>>>> quite different from other compression serialize formats such as >>>>> ProtoBuffer. >>>>> >>>>> Listed below are some sites for your information: >>>>> Here’s my Github: >>>>> https://github.com/liaohuqiu. >>>>> StackOverflow: >>>>> http://stackoverflow.com/users/2446397/srain >>>>> Blog: http://www.liaohuqiu.net/ >>>>> >>>>> Thank you for your time. >>>> >>>> sorry for delay, I was quite busy recently :< >>>> >>>> from what I can see, actually bin pack and msgpack are very similar. >>>> >>>> and the performance are also very similar (msgpack did more logics). >>>> but msgpack pack supports more languages and have more usage already. >>>> >>>> so, to me, I prefer make bin pack and msgpack computable rather than >>>> make a new "bin formart serialize protocol"... >>>> >>>> what do your think? >>> I am not subjecting this to be list in PECL, that is my 2 cents >>> >>> Anyway, the codes seems clear, >>> >>> one suggest, if you don't need MINIT/RINIT , then remove them.. >>> >>> Tyrael, please have a look of this :) >> >> Could you explain what do you mean compatible? >> do you mean binpack should you the same format as msgpack but only >> supporting the subset of the types? >> if thats possible and wouldn't require too much work I think it would be >> nice, but not mandatory for being allowed to pecl. > > > > -- > Laruence Xinchen Hui > http://www.laruence.com/