Re: Uploading extensions to PECL
| From: | John Boehr | Date: | Sat, 30 Apr 2016 06:27:58 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Uploading extensions to PECL | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-13715@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I will split this into one thread per extension then. Thanks for the
feedback.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:23 PM, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 12:08 PM, John Boehr <jbboehr@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I do not see issues not to have them in pecl.
>
> > Yes. It doesn't explicitly disallow wrappers for LGPLv2 libraries (or
> LGPL
> > extensions for that matter), and doesn't explain why it's discouraged.
>
> Right, while we strongly recommend BSDish-like, MIT or Apache. Lgplv2
> is still a can of worms, only with far less worms than lgplv3.
>
> It also mean lgplv2, not lgplv2 or later, which basically means v3 yet
> or v4 when it happens, etc.
>
> I would also recommend to make one post per ext if you expect some
> feedback about the code and related topics.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Pierre
>
> @pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org
>