Re: Naming clash (was: http extension)
| From: | Pierre-Alain Joye | Date: | Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:36:16 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Naming clash (was: http extension) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-1851@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:01:59 -0800
pollita@php.net (Sara Golemon) wrote:
> >> pecl_http is my suggestion. Even if we somehow manage to
> >isolate pear & > pecl, having 2 packages with the same name would
> >end up causing endless > confusion.
> >
> > well this is quite a nasty issue in general and has already
> > bitten us on the soap front iirc. even worse its likely to bite
> > us quite often. however I fear there is little we can do about
> > this aside from ugly prefixes for the project that comes second.
> >
> The *right* solution IMO, is to work towards namespace support in
> Zend.
I dream about that and real module support (a la python import),
missing time to dig in and get the ideas in this part of the ZE...
--Pierre