Re: Naming clash (was: http extension)
| From: | Derick Rethans | Date: | Wed, 26 Jan 2005 08:54:47 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Naming clash (was: http extension) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-1853@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Greg Beaver wrote:
> Lukas Smith wrote:
> > Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> >
> >> pecl_http is my suggestion. Even if we somehow manage to isolate pear
> >> & pecl, having 2 packages with the same name would end up causing
> >> endless confusion.
> >
> >
> > well this is quite a nasty issue in general and has already bitten us on
> > the soap front iirc. even worse its likely to bite us quite often.
> > however I fear there is little we can do about this aside from ugly
> > prefixes for the project that comes second.
>
> Channels solves this problem elegantly.
When is it ready? :)
Derick
--
Derick Rethans
http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org