Re: Naming clash (was: http extension)
| From: | Lukas Smith | Date: | Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:39:31 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Naming clash (was: http extension) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-1854@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Derick Rethans wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Greg Beaver wrote:I think I am repeating myself but here it is again: http://news.php.net/php.pear.core/2232 regards, LukasLukas Smith wrote:When is it ready? :)Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:Channels solves this problem elegantly.pecl_http is my suggestion. Even if we somehow manage to isolate pear & pecl, having 2 packages with the same name would end up causing endless confusion.well this is quite a nasty issue in general and has already bitten us on the soap front iirc. even worse its likely to bite us quite often. however I fear there is little we can do about this aside from ugly prefixes for the project that comes second.