Re: How many pecl packages have an different extension name from thepackage?
| From: | Steph | Date: | Sat, 24 Sep 2005 10:53:58 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: How many pecl packages have an different extension name from thepackage? | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-2983@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
SPL and Wez's actionscript SAPI are the two I recall having to fudge for the
who's who.
Better check WinBinder too.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg Beaver" <greg@chiaraquartet.net>
To: "PECL Announce" <pecl-dev@lists.php.net>
Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2005 7:25 AM
Subject: [PECL-DEV] How many pecl packages have an different extension name
from thepackage?
> Hi,
>
> One of the additions to package2.xml makes it possible to depend on a
> PECL extension without it being loaded into memory. This is through the
> <providesextension> tag, which tells the installer what extension is in
> the package. One of the changes in PEAR 1.4.1 is that running "pear
> convert" no longer assumes that the extension is a lower-cased version
> of the package name, so that package "PDO" is assumed to bundle
> extension "PDO" instead of "pdo".
>
> As I recall, the "SQLite" package is the "sqlite" extension (correct me
> if I'm wrong). How many other packages are there whose package
> name/extension name differ in case or actual name?
>
> Greg
>
> --
> PECL development discussion Mailing List (http://pecl.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>