Re: How many pecl packages have an different extension name from the package?
| From: | Wez Furlong | Date: | Sat, 24 Sep 2005 15:24:39 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: How many pecl packages have an different extension name from the package? | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-2985@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
PDO_DBLIB can generate one of three different extensions, depending on
the options that are passed to it's configure script.
--Wez.
On 9/24/05, Greg Beaver <greg@chiaraquartet.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One of the additions to package2.xml makes it possible to depend on a
> PECL extension without it being loaded into memory. This is through the
> <providesextension> tag, which tells the installer what extension is in
> the package. One of the changes in PEAR 1.4.1 is that running "pear
> convert" no longer assumes that the extension is a lower-cased version
> of the package name, so that package "PDO" is assumed to bundle
> extension "PDO" instead of "pdo".
>
> As I recall, the "SQLite" package is the "sqlite" extension (correct me
> if I'm wrong). How many other packages are there whose package
> name/extension name differ in case or actual name?
>
> Greg
>
> --
> PECL development discussion Mailing List (http://pecl.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>