Re: How many pecl packages have an different extension name from the package?

From: Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 15:24:39 +0000
Subject: Re: How many pecl packages have an different extension name from the package?
References: 1  Groups: php.pecl.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-2985@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
PDO_DBLIB can generate one of three different extensions, depending on the options that are passed to it's configure script. --Wez. On 9/24/05, Greg Beaver <greg@chiaraquartet.net> wrote: > Hi, > > One of the additions to package2.xml makes it possible to depend on a > PECL extension without it being loaded into memory. This is through the > <providesextension> tag, which tells the installer what extension is in > the package. One of the changes in PEAR 1.4.1 is that running "pear > convert" no longer assumes that the extension is a lower-cased version > of the package name, so that package "PDO" is assumed to bundle > extension "PDO" instead of "pdo". > > As I recall, the "SQLite" package is the "sqlite" extension (correct me > if I'm wrong). How many other packages are there whose package > name/extension name differ in case or actual name? > > Greg > > -- > PECL development discussion Mailing List (http://pecl.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >

« previous php.pecl.dev (#2985) next »