Re: Re: libzip?
| From: | Marcus Boerger | Date: | Sat, 12 Jan 2008 11:25:02 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: libzip? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-5048@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hello Pierre,
Friday, January 11, 2008, 8:58:55 PM, you wrote:
> On Jan 11, 2008 8:23 PM, Greg Beaver <greg@chiaraquartet.net> wrote:
>>
>> Pierre wrote:
>> > On Jan 11, 2008 5:21 PM, Gregory Beaver <greg@chiaraquartet.net> wrote:
>> >> Hi Pierre and folks,
>> >>
>> >> I wondered if you and the others would be amenable to moving libzip into
>> >> its own extension just like libxml is? This way, both ext/zip and
>> >> ext/phar could link to it without hassle, and it would be easier to
>> >> coordinate the efforts to move it into using php streams. I would be
>> >> happy to initiate the move and provide patches against all branches.
>> >
>> > Exporting the symbols will do the same. We can move the library
>> > outside but I don't want to do that for one very important reason:
>> > Keep the releases in both pecl and php-src. That's what makes zip very
>> > popular, there is no delay between important fixes and the releases.
>>
>> Hi again,
>>
>> Then do you mind if I begin work on the libzip inside pecl/zip?
> I never had problems with contributions. What do you want to change or
> add? As I told you, I have many changes to apply to add support for
> large files and allow lazy loading/saving (instead of keeping the file
> handles open).
Do you or do you plan to or do you dream of?
>> The
>> problem right now is that zip and phar cannot be built statically at the
>> same time, and it breaks gcov.
> I know that :) That's why I told that importing it in phar was a bad
> idea. It would have been better to ask before.
First it is open source.
Best regards,
Marcus