Re: PECL versioning

On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 12:34 AM, Steph Fox <steph@zend.com> wrote: > > First, if you are talking about the random discussions in completely > > unrelated topic, yes. I remember some comments about pecl. If you are > > talking about an actual discussion about PECL on internals (why not on > > pecl-dev), then no, I can't find any. > > "Splitting the subject: the PECL/PHP relationship" was a thread I began for > the explicit purpose of talking about PECL. You responded on it, although I > have to say you were fairly dismissive there too. > > > >> We're obviously not having the same conversation. Giving up on this > >> exchange > >> :) > > > > You are confusing. But if you don't want to discuss, that's your choice. > > I've tried to explain already that you are not talking about the same thing > I'm talking about. I simply asked for suggestions about how to correct the > information embedded in DLL files. Most of what you've said is totally > irrelevant to that, although it _is_ relevant to the discussion I tried to > start nearly three months ago on internals@. > > I've had a sane discussion with Elizabeth on irc now and I think there's a > way through the woods, I'll make a formal proposal (on pecl-dev) tomorrow. The very first sentence of your post is: "I've been looking into the existing PECL setup, preparing the way for putting package release DLLs on pecl.php.net." The rest talks about the DLL info information, and we have had a begin of a discussion about the needs... but heh, it's really boring to end in such discussions... Have a good night. -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org