Re: PECL versioning

Hi Rasmus, On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 3:57 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@lerdorf.com> wrote: > Steph Fox wrote: > > Hi Rasmus, > > > >> Note that there are some extensions we can't distribute from php.net > >> in binary form due without doing the annoying export exemption > >> paperwork. It wasn't an accident that pecl4win was a single non-US > >> hosted machine. > > > > Do we know which they are? If so we can mark them. > > The obvious one is mcrypt. But any binary that links in crypto code is > problematic. Here, read this: > > http://www.bis.doc.gov/licensing/exportingbasics.htm What's the legal rule or jurisprudence of a host "outside the US". Our (not so new) box for libgd and the wiki was also thought to host the new pecl site. Will that solve this problem as well? The windows build machine for the pecl releases (talking about the "complicated" way here" is also in Europe, in UK. Thanks for the head up, I completely forgot this little annoyance :P Cheers, -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org