Re: PECL versioning

Pierre,

You're making it sound mysteriously complicated, and I think that's probably because you're looking at the entire setup. There is *nothing* complicated about this first baby step, versioning is the only hiccup in it.

No, no and No, I'm not making it complicated. It is the fruits of hours of discussions with various developers and users.

You're the only person that has these discussions?

Now, if you want to add manually compiled binaries for php 5.2 right now, please do, your time :) But please keep in mind that will have to be changed to be automated and more flexible.

'More flexible' in what way? That doesn't make much sense in a Windows context, and all this conversation's been about Windows - nothing else. Basically the idea was to put up binaries built against 5.2.6 and then work on automating new release builds, because it doesn't make a lot of sense to start from 0 when you can start from 200, and because pecl4win is already there as a fallback. So yes I'd agree, come together and do plans and all that when we're talking about the other issues, like: automated builds, CVS branches in PECL, etc etc etc oh and fixing the website. But for now... if the issue of versioning could be resolved simply with an agreed standard for PECL projects, we'll all benefit straight away. - Steph