Re: New extension - phpredis
| From: | Nicolas Favre-Félix | Date: | Mon, 04 Apr 2011 16:50:01 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: New extension - phpredis | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-8100@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Thanks for the suggestion. The reason was indeed to avoid having to install
2 extensions, but I agree that it would be better to have the same behaviour
as APC.
I will make this change before applying for an account.
Cheers,
Nicolas
On 4 April 2011 18:03, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Gustavo Lopes <glopes@nebm.ist.utl.pt>
> wrote:
>
> > Is there any reason for bundling igbinary? It would be better to have it
> as
> > a dependency, especially now it's in PECL.
> >
> > Aside from that, +1
>
> Same here, it is also possible to do it without a build time
> dependency. See APC for an example.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Pierre
>
> @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net |
> http://www.libgd.org
>
> --
> PECL development discussion Mailing List (http://pecl.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>