Re: New extension - phpredis

From: Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 10:23:22 +0000
Subject: Re: New extension - phpredis
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.pecl.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-8276@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
hi What's the status here? Did you request a SVN account too? Cheers, 2011/4/4 Nicolas Favre-Félix <n.favrefelix@gmail.com>: > Thanks for the suggestion. The reason was indeed to avoid having to install > 2 extensions, but I agree that it would be better to have the same behaviour > as APC. > I will make this change before applying for an account. > > Cheers, > Nicolas > > On 4 April 2011 18:03, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Gustavo Lopes <glopes@nebm.ist.utl.pt> >> wrote: >> >> > Is there any reason for bundling igbinary? It would be better to have it >> > as >> > a dependency, especially now it's in PECL. >> > >> > Aside from that, +1 >> >> Same here, it is also possible to do it without a build time >> dependency. See APC for an example. >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> -- >> Pierre >> >> @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | >> http://www.libgd.org >> >> -- >> PECL development discussion Mailing List (http://pecl.php.net/) >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> > > -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org

« previous php.pecl.dev (#8276) next »