Re: Re: important change to documentation

Right, then it's a load-o-fun DSSSL style sheet job. :-) - Stig Richard Lynch wrote: > > It would be nice to *see* it on each function page, but perhaps it makes > sense for maintenance to just have it on the ref page... > > Except for functions added in a recent version of Foobar x.y.z, but I guess > they'd be recent to PHP as well, so that would show up with the planned > functionality of version tracking in the docs. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Stig Sæther Bakken <ssb@fast.no> > To: waldschrott <waldschrott@kiffen.de> > Cc: <php-dev@lists.php.net>; <php-qa@lists.php.net> > Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 7:10 AM > Subject: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] important change to documentation > > > waldschrott wrote: > > > > > > I propose that we should add information to *ALL* functions (function > > > collections) that require installing of third-party components. > > > > > > There were a few bug reports that killed themselves after upgrading to > > > make2.4.x.y or postgreSQL7.x.0 > > > > > > We should include with which versions these functions are expected to > > > work and perhaps with which versions they won´t work. (like mmcrypt and > > > pdflib)... > > > > > > thoughts? > > > > Do you really think it's necessary to put it in each function entry, or > > would a mention in each "ref" section be ok? > > > > - Stig > > > > -- > > PHP Quality Assurance Mailing List > > <http://www.php.net/> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-qa-unsubscribe@lists.php.net > > For additional commands, e-mail: php-qa-help@lists.php.net > > To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net