Re: Re: [RFC] Better benchmarks for PHP
| From: | Ólafur Waage | Date: | Sun, 15 Feb 2009 16:39:34 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [RFC] Better benchmarks for PHP | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-qa+get-64670@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I have not delved deep into the tests that are referenced in the rfc but do
they include comparison data?
Thinking if it would be useful for those who run the benchmarks to see where
they stand and even the ability to submit the data to increase the accuracy
of the benchmark comparison.
Thanks,
Olafur
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Sebastian Bergmann
> <sb@sebastian-bergmann.de> wrote:
> > Nuno Lopes schrieb:
> >> Comments, criticisms and volunteers especially welcome,
> >
> > When you do this, think about splitting each benchmark into a separate
> > file and have it run by a separate PHP process, see [1].
>
> To split them into separate files/cases is definitively a good thing.
>
> I'm not sure we should run them in parallel. As it makes sense for the
> phpt, it may have counter effects for benchmark tests. Concurrent
> executions of a given feature/extension could help (for apc and stat
> cache for example), but maybe not for every part of php, or not by
> default.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Pierre
>
> http://blog.thepimp.net |
> http://www.libgd.org
>
> --
> PHP Quality Assurance Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>