Re: Re: [RFC] Better benchmarks for PHP

Since we are talking about benchmarking real world applications, do we have a list of applications we wish to run the benchmarks on? On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Paul Biggar <paul.biggar@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Ólafur Waage <olafurw@gmail.com> wrote: > > I have not delved deep into the tests that are referenced in the rfc but > do > > they include comparison data? > > Most have very little. Typically, they are built into the benchmark. > I've updated the wiki page with everything I know about the data sets. > > > Paul > > > > > Thanks, > > Olafur > > > > On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> hi, > >> > >> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Sebastian Bergmann > >> <sb@sebastian-bergmann.de> wrote: > >> > Nuno Lopes schrieb: > >> >> Comments, criticisms and volunteers especially welcome, > >> > > >> > When you do this, think about splitting each benchmark into a > separate > >> > file and have it run by a separate PHP process, see [1]. > >> > >> To split them into separate files/cases is definitively a good thing. > >> > >> I'm not sure we should run them in parallel. As it makes sense for the > >> phpt, it may have counter effects for benchmark tests. Concurrent > >> executions of a given feature/extension could help (for apc and stat > >> cache for example), but maybe not for every part of php, or not by > >> default. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> -- > >> Pierre > >> > >> http://blog.thepimp.net | > >> http://www.libgd.org > >> > >> -- > >> PHP Quality Assurance Mailing List > >> <http://www.php.net/> > >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > Paul Biggar > paul.biggar@gmail.com >