Re: Re: [RFC] Better benchmarks for PHP

On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Ólafur Waage <olafurw@gmail.com> wrote: > I have not delved deep into the tests that are referenced in the rfc but do > they include comparison data? Most have very little. Typically, they are built into the benchmark. I've updated the wiki page with everything I know about the data sets. Paul > > Thanks, > Olafur > > On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: > >> hi, >> >> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Sebastian Bergmann >> <sb@sebastian-bergmann.de> wrote: >> > Nuno Lopes schrieb: >> >> Comments, criticisms and volunteers especially welcome, >> > >> > When you do this, think about splitting each benchmark into a separate >> > file and have it run by a separate PHP process, see [1]. >> >> To split them into separate files/cases is definitively a good thing. >> >> I'm not sure we should run them in parallel. As it makes sense for the >> phpt, it may have counter effects for benchmark tests. Concurrent >> executions of a given feature/extension could help (for apc and stat >> cache for example), but maybe not for every part of php, or not by >> default. >> >> Cheers, >> -- >> Pierre >> >> http://blog.thepimp.net | >> http://www.libgd.org >> >> -- >> PHP Quality Assurance Mailing List >> <http://www.php.net/> >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> >> > -- Paul Biggar paul.biggar@gmail.com