Re: Repo name

From: Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:49:16 +0000
Subject: Re: Repo name
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.standards 
Request: Send a blank email to standards-+get-123@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Jul 30, 2014, at 11:27 AM, Sara Golemon <pollita@php.net> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me> wrote: >>> +1 for php-lang, nice contrast to php-the/any-implementation. >> >> php-lang is nice, but I think php-spec is clearer. php-spec is the specification, php-src >> is the source code to implement it. >> > Yeah, which is why it was the obvious choice. Given phpspec's 7 year > usage history though, it's not unreasonable to ask us to pick > something non-conflicting (within reason). ((Can't blame them for > assuming there would never be a PHP specification :p )) Perhaps "php-langspec" covers all the concerns: short, clear, conflict-free. -- Paul M. Jones pmjones88@gmail.com http://paul-m-jones.com Modernizing Legacy Applications in PHP http://mlaphp.com

« previous php.standards (#123) next »