Re: Repo name

I like php-langspec, too. Ben On Jul 30, 2014, at 3:00 PM, Hannes Magnusson <hannes.magnusson@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Paul M. Jones <pmjones88@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Jul 30, 2014, at 11:27 AM, Sara Golemon <pollita@php.net> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me> wrote: >>>>> +1 for php-lang, nice contrast to php-the/any-implementation. >>>> >>>> php-lang is nice, but I think php-spec is clearer. php-spec is the specification, >>>> php-src is the source code to implement it. >>>> >>> Yeah, which is why it was the obvious choice. Given phpspec's 7 year >>> usage history though, it's not unreasonable to ask us to pick >>> something non-conflicting (within reason). ((Can't blame them for >>> assuming there would never be a PHP specification :p )) >> >> Perhaps "php-langspec" covers all the concerns: short, clear, conflict-free. > > I actually quite like it :) > But now that the initial draft has been pushed and links are > spreading... Is it still worth renaming? > > If anyone makes an executive decision here then.. I can delete the > github repo and "move" it on git.php.net.... > > -Hannes > > -- > PHP Naming Standardization Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >